Ramesh Yeduba Tyade v. The Special Land Acquistion Officer M.I.W. Buldhana And Another

1 17cao954.22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION [CAO] NO.954 OF 2022 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO.3935 OF 2020 IN RC NO.421/2014 [FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.9821/2014] [Ramesh Yeduba Tyade .vs. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Buldhana and one] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri R.B. Dhore, Advocate Applicant.

.................

CORAM : PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.

DATED : SEPTEMBER 23, 2025 .

1.

Heard.

2.

By this application, the applicant is seeking condonation 2033 days delay in filing the restoration application of appeal, which was rejected vide order dated 22.7.2014.

3.

In the application, the applicant has given specific reasons for the delay.

4.

Hence, considering the reasons stated in the application, the delay stands condoned, subject to the costs of Rs.5,000/- to be paid to the High Court Bar Association, Nagpur within a period of three weeks.

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO.3935/2020 5.

Heard.

6.

By this application, the applicant is seeking restoration of first appeal, which was rejected vide order dated 22.7.2014 for non removal of office objection.

2 17cao954.22.odt 7.

For the reasons stated in the application and the fact that the appellant is seeking enhancement in compensation, the application is allowed and disposed of.

8.

Office to register the appeal.

9.

The appellant to remove office objection within a period of four weeks.

FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.9821/2014 10.

List the matter after removal of office objection for further consideration.

(PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.) Gulande