Shri Hari Rice And Agro Ltd. Through Its Chairman And Managing Director, Prakash Ramdeo Jaiswal v. The Industrial Finance Corporation Of India Ltd., New Delhi And Another

WP1540-15 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1540/2015 (SHRI HARI RICE & AGRO LIMITED, GONDIA VERSUS THE INDUSTRIAL FINANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED & ANOTHER) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri P. Agrawal, counsel for the petitioner.

Shri M.N. Phadke, counsel for the R-1.

Shri M. Anilkumar, counsel for the R-2.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATE : OCTOBER 5 , 2015.

By this petition, the petitioner impugns the order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Delhi dated 13.04.2012. The petition is filed on 02.03.2015. A preliminary objection is raised on behalf of the respondents to the tenability of the writ petition in the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court. It is stated that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Delhi that stands confirmed by the order passed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi, the petitioner would be required to challenge the order before the Delhi High Court.

By upholding the preliminary objection raised on behalf of the respondents, we decline to entertain the petition. The writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. The points raised in the petition are, however, kept open.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE