M/S Komal Construction, Through Its Prop. Shri Rajendra S/O Chunnilal Somani And 2 Others v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Mumbai And 3 Oth

3003caw691.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CAW NO. 691/2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3863 OF 2015 (M/s. Komal Construction, thr. its Proprietor Shri Rajendra Chunnilal Somani & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra thr. the Principal Secretary, Department of Public Works & Ors.) (Sharda Construction and Corporation Pvt. Ltd. thr. its Power of Attorney Holder Shri Madhav Ramrao Eklare - Applicant) _____________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ.

MARCH 30, 2016.

The applicant, who has succeeded in tender process is seeking his joining as party respondent. The application is strongly opposed by the petitioner.

We have heard Shri S.A. Dharmadhikari, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mrs. Bharti Dangre, learned GP for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and Shri R. Dhore, learned counsel for the applicant/ proposed intervenor/ respondent. In writ petition, the challenge is to tender process itself. If the petition is allowed, participation by the applicant will be wiped out.

In the circumstances, civil application is allowed. The applicant be added as party respondent No. 5. The necessary amendment be carried out within one week. The added respondent to file reply, if any, within two weeks from today.

List the matter on 13.04.2016.

JUDGE JUDGE *GS.