← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1331/2021disposed off

Vijay S/O. Haribhau Borikar v. Rajendra Prasad Singh Thakur

2021-06-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale3 pages

1 / 3 34-WP 1331.2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1331 OF 2021 Vijay s/o. Haribhau Borikar vs.

Rajendra Prasad Singh Thakur ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court'

s orders Court'

s or Judge'

s Orders.

or directions and Registrar'

s orders.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. R. R. Dawda, Advocate for petitioner.

CORAM :

MANISH PITALE J.

DATE : 23/06/2021 Hearing was conducted through Video Conferencing and the learned counsel agreed that the audio and visual quality was proper.

2.

In this writ petition (original landlord) is aggrieved by the order passed by the Court below whereby the respondent tenant has been directed to pay amount of Rs.3000/- p.m. towards occupational charges in respect of the suit premises for stay of the decree granted by the trial Court in favour of the petitioner.

3.

It is submitted that the learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out before this Court, on

2 / 3 34-WP 1331.2021 01/04/2021, that the quantum of occupational charges was required to be enhanced, considering the fact that suit premises is located at Dharampeth, Nagpur.

4.

This Court issued notice for final disposal.

It appears that there was a caveat filed on behalf of the respondent but, the office note shows that notice issued for final disposal is yet to be served on the said respondent.

5.

The learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions submits that if this Court directs the appellate Court to dispose of the appeal filed by the respondent in a time bound manner, the petitioner would be satisfied and that he would not press the present writ petition.

6.

In the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that a very reasonable request is made on behalf of the petitioner and that the same can be granted, even if notice is yet to be served on the respondent. The expeditious disposal of the appeal will accrue to the benefit of both the parties. 7.

Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of by directing the Court below i.e. Special

3 / 3 34-WP 1331.2021 Judge, Special Court for differently abled persons, Senior Citizens and marginalized Section of society, Nagpur, to dispose of Regular Civil Appeal No.128 of 2019, as expeditiously as possible and in any case on or before 31st December, 2021.

JUDGE