← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1366/2019dismissedrule discharged

M/S. Shriram Construction Company, Amravati Thr. Partner And Others v. State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary To Government Irrigaiton Department, Mumbai And Others

2019-04-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar1 pages

WP1366-19 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1366/2019 (M/S SHRIRAM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri P.R. Agrawal, counsel for petitioner.

Shri V.G. Palshikar, counsel for R-3 to 6.

CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.

DATE : APRIL , 2019.

The petitioners who are the original plaintiffs are aggrieved by the order passed below Exhibit 245 and 248 whereby the permission sought by them to place documents on record has been rejected.

One of the grounds assigned is that the said applications were filed when the suit was fixed for final arguments. Considering aforesaid aspect, I am not inclined to examine the challenge as raised to the impugned orders in writ jurisdiction. With liberty to the petitioner to raise the challenge to the aforesaid order in appeal if the occasion arises, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs.

JUDGE APTE