← Library
Bombay High CourtMCA/402/2019rejected at admission stage

Rupchand S/O Krishnarao Gharde v. Smt. Ratnamala W/O Digambar Borghate And Another

2019-04-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban Deo1 pages

1 mca402.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO.402 OF 2019 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.244 OF 2002 (Rupchand s/o Krishnarao Gharde ..vs.. Smt. Ratnamala w/o Digambar Borghate and another) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.S. Dhengale, Counsel for the applicant. CORAM : ROHIT B. DEO, J.

DATED : 08-04-2019 No case for review is made out.

2.

The judgment does not suffer from any error which is apparent on the face of the record.

3.

The grounds are that this Court has not considered certain vital aspects including that the Will Exhibit 31 is indeed shrouded by suspicious circumstances. If the conclusions arrived at by this Court are erroneous, the same can be corrected in appropriate proceedings. However, this review application is clearly misconceived.

4.

The application is rejected.

JUDGE adgokar