Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Thr. Its Divisional Controller, Nagpur v. Krushna S/O Dattpopant Thanekar And 2 Others

2806caw589.17 1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 589 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4660 OF 2013 (Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation vs. Krushna s/o Dattopant Thanekar and others) ______________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

Shri V.H. Kedar, Advocate for petitioner.

Shri S.N. Dandekar, Advocate for respondent no.1. Shri K.R. Lule, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos.2 and 3.

-------- CORAM : P.N. DESHMUKH, J.

DATED : JUNE 28, 2017 Heard learned Counsel for parties.

This is an application for early hearing by fixed date moved by petitioner.

Shri Kedar, learned Counsel for petitioner, has submitted that respondent no.1 retired in December 2014 and as per rules, gratuity amount is calculated, which comes to Rs.3,08,969/- approximately. However, if petition is allowed, respondent no.1 shall not be entitled for the said amount. It is, therefore, submitted that either petition be heard or aforesaid amount may be permitted to be deposited in the Court.

Learned Counsel for both sides state that petition be heard by giving a fixed date.

In the circumstances, civil application is allowed. The petition be shown in the caption of final hearing on 9/8/2017.

JUDGE khj