Jatin Kishor Ingale And Others v. Union Of India Thr. Its Secretary Ministry Of Human Resource Development New Delhi And Others

2025:BHC-NAG:4925-DB

08. WP 1818 of 2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1818/2024 Jatin Kishor Ingale and others ...Versus...

Union of India Through its Secretary Ministry of Human Resource Development, New Delhi 110001 and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Ms Aastha Sharma, Advocate h/f Mr. P.R. Agrawal, Advocate for petitioners Mr. S.A. Chaudhari, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mrs. Mugdha R. Chandurkar, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3 Mr. P.P. Pendke, AGP for respondent No.4 Mr. R.M. Tiwari, Advocate for respondent No.7 CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.

DATE : 08/05/2025 1.

Learned Advocates for the petitioners and the respondents jointly submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties. Accordingly, they have prepared the consent terms dated 28/04/2025. Therefore, the learned Advocate for the petitioners submits that the petitioners do not want to proceed with the petition in view of the settlement terms.

2.

The statement made by the learned Advocate for the petitioners is accepted.

3.

In view of the statement, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn in view of the settlement between the parties. No order as to costs.

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) Wadkar