← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/186/2022allowed

The Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., Pune Thr. Nagpur Office, Nagpur v. Smt. Sangita Wd/O Ghanshyam Shirsagar And Others

2022-03-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice V. G. Bisht1 pages

8-CAO-186-22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (O) NO. 186 OF 2022 IN CIVIL APPLICATION (F) NO. 2502 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 254 OF 2021 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

VERSUS

SMT. SANGEETA GHANSHYAM SHIRSAGAR AND OTHERS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'

s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders of directions and Registrar'

s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mrs. Mrunal Naik, Advocate for appellant.

CORAM : V. G. BISHT, J.

DATE : 28/03/2022 Learned counsel for the applicant states that in the order dated 22/02/2021 passed in Civil Application (O) No. 152/2021, inadvertently instead of respondent nos. 1 to 3, the respondent nos. 1 and 2 were permitted to withdraw 50% of the compensation. He prays for necessary correction in the said order. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed.

In Para No. 3 of the order dated 22/02/2021 passed in Civil Application (O) No.152/2021, the respondent nos. 1 and 2 be substituted by the respondent nos. 1 to 3.

Necessary corrections be carried out in the said order and the corrected order be uploaded on the website. [ V. G. BISHT, J. ] Choulwar VITHAL MAROTRAO CHOULWAR MAROTRAO CHOULWAR Date: 2022.03.28 17:19:27 +0530