Bombay High CourtCAO/352/2016admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Sau. Shalini W/O Dhanraj Shirsat v. Dhanraj S/O Tukaram Shirsat

2016-07-22Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Swapna Joshi2 pages

CAO352-16 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.O. 352/2016 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 90/2015 (SHALINI DHANJRAJ SHIRSAT VERSUS DHANRAJ TUKARAM SHIRSAT) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.K. Choube, counsel for the applicant.

Shri A.M. Tiruth, counsel for the non-applicant. CORAM : SMT.VASANTI A. NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : JULY 22 , 2016.

Heard. Perused the contents of the application. Though the learned counsel for the non-applicant opposes the prayer made in the application, for the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the certified copy of the impugned judgment is condoned.

The civil application is allowed and disposed of. F.C.A. NO. 90/2015.

Issue notice to the respondent, returnable after three weeks.

The respondent is put to notice that the Family Court Appeal could be decided finally at the stage of admission. Record & Proceedings should be secured till the next date of hearing.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE

CAO352-16 CERTIFICATE copy of original signed Judgment/Order.

Uploaded by: Rohit D. Apte.

Uploaded on : 22.07.2016.