Bombay High CourtCP/64/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Amit S/O Bhagwan Gedam v. State Of Mah., In The Ministry Of Revenue And Forest, Thr. Secty., Shri S.S. Kshatriya Mumbai And

2015-06-26Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.B. Varale1 pages

CPs63&64-15 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.63/2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1737/2014 (D) (MAHESH CHUNNILAL GUPTA VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANOTHER) WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.64/2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1737/2014 (D) (AMIT BHAGWAN GEDAM VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANOTHER) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri V.S. Kukday, counsel for the petitioner. Shri A.D. Sonak, A.G.P. for the respondents.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ.

DATE : JUNE 26 , 2015.

Heard.

It appears that the order of which the contempt is alleged has been complied by the respondents. Hence, we dispose of the contempt petition with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE APTE