Bombay High CourtCAW/645/2018admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Jawahar S/O Jivtu Bhiwagade v. The Deputy Director, Vocational Education And Training, Sadar, Nagpur And Others

2018-04-04Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Swapna Joshi1 pages

1 caw645.18.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION [W] NO.645/2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3955/2001 [D] [Jawahar s/o Jivtu Bhiwgade .vs. The Deputy Director, Vocational Education and Training, Sadar, Nagpur and others] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.S. Fulzele, AGP for respondent no.1-State. ..........

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOS HI, JJ .

DATED : APRIL 04, 2018.

By this civil application, the applicant seeks the correction of the typographical error in the judgment dated 5.6.2017 in Writ Petition No.3955/2001.

According to the applicant, the date of the order impugned in the petition is wrongly mentioned in the judgment as 22.2.1996 though the date of the impugned order is 1.2.1997. It is stated that though the designation of the applicant-petitioner is lecturer/full time teacher, it is wrongly mentioned in the impugned order that the petitioner is an instructor. The date of the impugned order in the writ petition may be substituted as 1.2.1997 for 22.2.1996.

The judgment was dictated in open court. It was necessary for the petitioner to have pointed out that the petitioner was not appointed on the post of instructor and was appointed as a lecturer/full time teacher since we have used the word 'instructor' at several places in the judgment. However, since the correction that is sought by the applicant is formal, we grant the same. Hence, instead of the word 'instructor' in the judgment, the word 'lecturer/full time teacher' may be used. The civil application is allowed and disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Gulande