Bombay High CourtCAW/504/2015dismissedrule discharged

Surendra S/O Dinanath Sharma v. Smt. Vijaylaxmi Ganesh Jaiswal And 2 Others

2015-11-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 wp1045.14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1045 OF 2014.

(SURENDRA DINANATH SHARMA...VS..SMT. VIJAYLAXMI GANESH JAISWAL & 2 OTH..) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri R.M.Sharma, Advocate for Petitioner.

Shri Chitley, Adv. h/f. Shri A.A.Naik, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : NOVEMBER 24, 2015.

PURSIS ST. NO. 2295/2014.

Seen the Pursis.

It is rejected with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate application.

CAW NO. 504/2015.

It is undisputed that the civil application was before the Court at the time when the order issuing Rule came to be passed. It is also undisputed that the judgment on which the learned advocate for the petitioner relies and contends that the issue is covered, was also considered when the Rule came to be issued.

The Civil Application for disposal of the petition is dismissed.

JUDGE RRaut..