Bombay High CourtWP/2801/2014dispossed offdismiss for default

Gajanan Hiraman Nagekar v. State Of Maharashtra, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Education, Mumbai And 4 Others

2015-03-20Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.M. Badar1 pages

WP2801-14 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2801/2014 (GAJANAN HIRAMAN NAGEKAR VERSUS STATE OF MAH. & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri P.N. Shende, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.S. Khubalkar, A.G.P. for the R-1 to 3. Mrs. R.D. Raskar, counsel for the R-4.

Shri Nandesh S. Deshpande, counsel for the R-5. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.M. BADAR, JJ.

DATE : MARCH 20 , 2015.

Shri Shende, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed and the writ petition could be disposed of.

In view of the aforesaid statement, we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE