Bombay High CourtCAO/1399/2016admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Shri. Rakesh S/O. Manohar Karwade v. Smt. Laxmi @ Kiran W/O. Rakesh Karwade

2016-10-24Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Kum. Justice Indira Jain1 pages

CAO1399-16 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.O. NO.1399/2016 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL ST. NO. 4718/2016 (RAKESH MANOHAR KARWADE VERSUS LAXMI @ KIRAN RAKESH KARWADE) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri N.R. Bhishikar, counsel for the applicant. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.

DATE : OCTOBER 24 , 2016.

Heard. Perused the contents of the application. None appears for the respondent, though served. The respondent has also not filed a reply to the civil application. The statements of facts made in the civil application remain uncontroverted.

The civil application is allowed and disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE APTE