Bombay High CourtCP/65/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Ku. Pratibha Harishchandra Rathod v. State Of Maharashtra, Through Its Collector And President Of District Selection Committee, Amravati

2015-12-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice B.R. Gavai,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 cp65.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.65 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2992 OF 2014(D) (Ku. Pratibha Harishchandra Rathod ..vs.. State of Maharashtra, through its Collector & President of District Selection Committee, Amravati Division, Amravati and others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Manoj Sable, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & Z.A. HAQ, JJ.

DATE : 21-12-2015.

The Advocate for the respondent Nos.2 and 3Zilla Parishad has placed on record the copy of order dated 05-12-2015 thereby issuing appointment order in favour of the petitioner, which is marked "X" for identification.

In that view, we find that the order dated 19-01-2015 stands duly complied with. We, therefore, do not find it necessary to proceed further in the present contempt proceedings.

The contempt proceeding is disposed accordingly.

JUDGE JUDGE pma