Dnyaneshwar S/O Laxmanrao Amzhare v. State Of Maha., Thr. Dy. Collector (Land Acquisition), Amravati And Others

(1) 46mca157.25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.157/2025 (Review) IN WRIT PETITION NO.8377/2023 (D) Dnyaneshwar Laxmanrao Amzhare .Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Vinay Dahat, Advocate for petitioner.

Petitioner-in-person present.

CORAM :

ANIL L. PANSARE, J.

DATE :

MARCH 18, 2025 On 27.02.2025, following order was passed.

"1.

Shri Vinay Dahat, learned counsel is requested to appear on behalf of applicant/petitioner-in-person. 2.

Heard.

3.

It appears that because of inadvertent mistake that occurred in the order sought to be reviewed, the applicant has filed present application.

4.

What transpired during the course of argument is that in Para No.6, the Court has noted that Shri Laxman Shivaji Amzhare sold the property to respondent No.1, whereas the property was sold to respondent No.2. 5.

Shri Vinay Dahat, learned counsel seeks time to prepare.

6.

Time granted.

7.

List the matter in the week commencing from 17/03/2025."

2.

Purpose of filing the application will be served if the words "respondent No.1" appearing in fourth line of paragraph 6 and in the last line of paragraph 7 are replaced by the words "Respondent No.6". 3.

Necessary corrections be made in order dated 27.01.2025 and corrected order be uploaded forthwith.

4.

Since the above mistake cannot be said to be an error apparent on the face of record that would require review of the order under question, the application is dismissed.

(2) 46mca157.25 5.

Needless to mention here that the relinquishment deed under question, if relied upon for collateral purpose, the Trial Court shall consider the same, in accordance with law. 6.

Professional fees of Mr. Vinay Dahat, learned counsel appointed for the applicant, be quantified and paid accordingly by the High Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Nagpur. 7.

The application is disposed of.

(Anil L. Pansare, J.) Kahale