← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/107/2018disposedoff

Jagdeo Bhivsen Belkhede v. Shri Nand Kumar, Secretary, Education Department, Mumbai And Others

2018-08-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq2 pages

1 cp107.18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.107/2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.951/1998 Jagdeo Bhivsen Belkhede ..Vs..

Shri Nand Kumar, Secretary Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri R.D. Karode, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri S.Y. Deopujari, Government Pleader for respondent No.1. Shri Mangesh V. Bute, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND Z.A.HAQ, JJ. DATED : 6.8.2018.

1.

Heard for some time.

2.

We grant petitioner leave to make suitable representation to Chief Executive Engineer, Zilla Parishad, Yavatmal in terms of judgment dated 5th February, 2015 in Writ Petition No.951/1998, particularly paragraph 14, thereof.

3.

If such representation is made, it shall be looked into by that Authority within four weeks of it's receipt.

4.

We are passing this order in contempt petition as the controversy is in relation to terminal benefits of a retired employee and in Writ Petition No.951/1998 Zilla

2 cp107.18 Parishad, Yavatmal was not party. It is not party even in present contempt petition.

5.

Hence, with these observations and keeping all remedies of petitioner open, we dispose of present contempt petition. No costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Tambaskar.