Ramchandra S/O Krishnarao Pardikar v. Shri M. Devendra (Chief Executive Officer, Z.P. Akola) And Another

Order 0903cp85.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

CONTEMPT PETITION NO.85/2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6176/2013.

Ramchandra Krishnarao Pardikar -VERSUSShri M. Devendra, CEO, Z.P. Akola and another. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ.

DATE : MARCH 09, 2016.

Heard Shri P.D. Meghe, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri B.N. Jaipurkar, learned Counsel for respondent no.1.

2.

Learned Counsel for respondent no.1 has handed over proceedings of hearing conducted on 07.11.2014. He submits that on very same day, after hearing, the representation made by the petitioner came to be rejected.

3.

Proceedings produced by the learned counsel for respondent no.1 are taken on record and marked as "Exh.X". Its copy is served upon learned counsel for

Order 0903cp85.15 petitioner in court. Learned counsel for petitioner points out that date of decision is not expressly recorded in the said proceedings.

4.

We keep all the challenges in regard to said proceedings open. However, as it is informed that the decision on the representation has been taken, we are not inclined to keep the contempt petition pending. The same is disposed of. No costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Rgd.