Sunil S/O Digambar Patil (Gondchawar) v. Haribhau Baliram Gondchawar And ANR

revn32.11.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL REVISION NO.32/2011 Sunil Digambar Patil (Gondwhawar).vs.Haribhau Baliram Gondchawar & anr. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

Mr. P. S. Wathore, Advocate for applicant.

CORAM : V.M. DESHPANDE, J.

DATED :

JULY 7, 2017 Heard learned counsel for the applicant. By this revision the applicant who was convicted by the learned trial Court on 15.10.2009 for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the negotiable Instruments Act and confirmed by the lower appellate Court is before this Court.

Though the applicant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, no jail sentence was imposed on him. The sentence of fine amount was imposed on the applicant. The fine amount that was imposed by the Court below was Rs.2,10,000/- and out of that Rs.2,05,000/- was paid to the original complainantpresent non applicant and by way of compensation and Rs. 5,000/- was to be deposited in the Treasury. The appeal which was carried by the present applicant against the said order bearing Criminal Appeal

revn32.11.odt No.104/2009 was also dismissed by the appellate Court on 08.12.2010.

Mr. Wathore, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the entire fine amount is already paid. The learned counsel for the other side states that the amount is already received. However, according to their submission, when the non bailable warrant was issued by the Court, then only the amount of fine was deposited.

Be that as it may, the amount fine is already deposited by the present applicant. In that view of the matter, nothing survives in the present revision. The same is therefore disposed of.

JUDGE kahale