← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1529/2021rule absolute

Ramratan Shriramlal Jaiswal v. State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secretary, State Excise Dept., Mumbai And Anothers

2021-06-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor2 pages

wp1529.2021.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

WRIT PETITION NO.1529/2021 Ramratan Shriramlal Jaiswal, age 79 Yrs., Occu. Business, R/o at Post Mundgaon, Tal. Akola, Dist. Akola.

..Petitioner.

..Vs..

1.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Principal Secretary, State Excise Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

2.

The Hon'ble Minister, State Excise Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

..Respondent.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shri V.S. Undre, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.R. Patil, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM :- SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

DATED :- 19 .

.202 .

ORAL JUDGMENT (Per Sunil B. Shukre, J.) Hearing is conducted through Video Conferencing and all the learned Advocates agreed that the audio and visual quality was proper. 2.

Heard Shri V.S. Undre, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Neeraj Patil, learned A.G.P. who appears by waiving notice for respondent Nos.1 and 2.

wp1529.2021.odt 3.

Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties.

4.

Respondent No.2 is directed to decide the revision petition filed by the petitioner on 2nd September, 2016 under Section 138 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within three months from the date of the order, if it is not already decided. Rule accordingly. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE Tambaskar.