Bombay High CourtCAW/563/2016admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Abhinay S/O. Khushal Dhoble v. State Of Maha. Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Education And Sports Mantralaya, Mumbai And Others

2016-03-08Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.M. Deshpande2 pages

WP1667-16 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 1667/2016 (ABHINAY KHUSHAL DHOBLE VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Anand Parchure, counsel for the petitioner. CORAM : SMT.VASANTI A. NAIK AND V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATE : MARCH 08 , 2016.

By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the termination of his services as a Shikshan Sevak. It is stated on behalf of the petitioner that the respondent no.3-Education Officer (Secondary) had, by the communication dated 08.01.2016, directed the termination of the excess Shikshan Sevaks and stopped the payment of salary to them and, hence, the services of the petitioner were terminated by the management. It is stated that by a subsequent communication dated 15.02.2016, the Education Officer has cancelled the earlier communication by which the Shikshan Sevaks were directed to be terminated. It is stated that despite the cancellation of the earlier order of the respondent no.3-Education Officer (Secondary), the management had not reinstated the petitioner in service. Issue notice of final disposal to the respondents, returnable on 17.03.2016.

Shri N.R. Rode, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, waives notice on behalf of the respondent nos.1 to 3. The petitioner is permitted to serve the respondent nos.4 and 5 (wrongly mentioned as 5 and 6) by Speed Post in addition to the regular mode of service.

The petitioner is permitted to amend the cause title of the writ petition and the amendment application.

WP1667-16 C.A.W. NO.563/2016.

The prayer made in the civil application is granted. The amendment should be carried out within a period of one week. The civil application is disposed of.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE