← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/618/2016rejected at admission stage

Aradhana Garments Through Its Prop. Shri Anandram S/O Bhagatram Balwani v. Shri Suresh S/O Rajaram Mandurkar And 2 Others

2018-09-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar1 pages

905C-CAO-618-16 1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.618 OF 2016 IN REVIEW APPLICATION ST. NO.5144 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5426 OF 2015 (D) Aradhana Garments, Thr. Its Proprietor Anandram Balwani, Bhandara -vsSuresh s/o Rajaram Mandurkar and ors.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders.

or directions and Registrar's orders.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri S. R. Bhongade, Advocate for applicant.

CORAM : A.S.CHANDURKAR, J.

DATE : September 05, 2018.

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant on the application for condonation of delay as well as on the prayer for review of the judgment dated 16th and 17th December, 2015.

It is submitted by relying upon the decision in Asia Foundation and construction Ltd. Nagpur and Anr. vs. Engineering Kamgar Sanghatana Nagpur and Anr. 2016 (2) Mh.L.J. 406 that the contentions that were urged on behalf of the present applicant in the aforesaid writ petition are liable to be accepted. The said judgment of the Division Bench is dated 18th December 2015 which is subsequent to the decision in the present writ petition. A decision rendered subsequently would not be a ground to review an order passed earlier.

I do not find any error apparent in the judgment of which review is sought. Hence the applications are rejected. JUDGE Asmita