Mr. Vinod S/O. Niranjan Tatke And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Ps. Mangrulpir Dist. Washim And Another

1 apl180.18.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APL] NO.180 OF 2018 [Mr. Vinod s/o Niranjan Tatke and others .vs. The State of Maharashtra and one] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri M.S. Wakil, counsel for the applicants, Ms. Shamshi Haider, APP for non-applicant no.1-State. ..........

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : MARCH 19, 2018.

By this criminal application the applicants seek the quashing and setting aside the first information report registered against the applicants for the offences punishable under sections 354-A, 395, 323, 504 and 506 of the Penal Code. On a reading of the allegations in the first information report and on the perusal of the other documents annexed to the criminal application, it appears that the first information report registered against the applicants cannot be quashed and set aside by exercising the jurisdiction under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It cannot be said that the allegations levelled against the applicants in the first information report, even if they are accepted at their face value, would not make out an offence against the applicants.

In the result, criminal application is disposed of. Order accordingly.

JUDGE JUDGE Gulande