← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1616/2022dismissed as withdrawn

Mustaqueem S/O Maqsood Ahamad Siddiqi v. State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Revenue And Forest Department, Mumbai And Others

2022-04-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban Deo1 pages

wp1613.22.O.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.

(Ashif s/o Maqsood Ahamad Siddiqi Vs. State of Maharashtra, thr. its Secretary, Revenue & Forest Department, Mumbai and others) WRIT PETITION NO.

(Ashish s/o Babaraoji Sawarkar Vs. State of Maharashtra, thr. its Secretary, Revenue & Forest Department, Mumbai and others) WRIT PETITION NO.

(Mustaqueem s/o Maqsood Ahamad Siddiqi Vs. State of Maharashtra, thr. its Secretary, Revenue & Forest Department, Mumbai and others) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. A. R. Ingole, Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr. S. M. Ukey, Addl. GP for Respondents 1 to 4/State. [WP 1613/2022] Mr. N. R. Rode, AGP for Respondents 1 to 4/State. [WP 1615/2022] Mr. S. M. Ukey, Addl. GP for Respondents 1 to 4/State. [WP 1616/2022] CORAM: ROHIT B. DEO , J.

DATE: 4 th APRIL, .

On a motion moved by the learned counsel Mr. Ingole for the petitioner in all the three petitions, the petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

2.

I have perused the affidavits placed on record by the Divisional Commissioners of the Nagpur and Amravati Revenue Divisions.

3.

It appears from the affidavits, that the Divisional Commissioners are taking appropriate steps to ensure that orders are not passed by Officers contrary to the mandate of Section 48 (8)(2) of the Land Revenue Code, 1966. JUDGE SHIVNARAYAN NIKHARE NSN