Shekhar S/O Purushottam Kannao And 5 ORS v. New India Assurance Company Ltd. Thr. Its Chief Reg. Manager

1 1.caw.869.23.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C IVIL APPLICATION (W) NO. 869/2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO.

3778/2010 Shekhar s/o. Purushottam Kannao and Ors.

Vs.

New India Assurance Company Limited and Ors.

................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order or directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................... Mr. R. D. Dharmadhikari, Advocate with Mr. R. M. Pande, Advocate for Petitioners.

Mr. B. P. Bhatt, Advocate for Respondents 1 and 2. Mr. S. D. Chopde, Advocate for Applicants/Intervenor. CORAM :

ROHIT B. DEO AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.

DATED :

13.04.2023 .

Heard 2.

The intervenors claim that they are similarly situated as the petitioners.

3.

If that be so, and if the intervenors are of the view, that they are also entitled to the relief which the petitioners are claiming, the intervenors are at liberty to file independent and substantive petition inasmuch as the aspect of delay, fence-sitting etc. may possibly be an issue which will have to be addressed.

2 1.caw.869.23.odt 4.

The application is dismissed.

WRIT PETITION NO.

3778/2010 .

Let the petition be listed after vacation.

(MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (ROHIT B. DEO, J.) RGurnule MANOJ MANDADE 19:30