Smt. Shashikala Wd/O Shankarrao Bhandarkar And Others v. Raj @ Tejraj S/O Govardhan Indurkar

sa144of19.odt 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL 144 of 2019 (Smt. Shashikala wd/o. Shankarrao Bhandarkar & ors..vs.. Raj @ Tejraj s/o. Govardhan Indurkar) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ms. V.V. Tiwari (appointed) counsel for respondent. CORAM: ROHIT B. DEO, J.

DATE: 16 th APRIL, 2019.

The learned counsel for the appellants is absent even on second call.

The learned counsel Ms. V.V. Tiwari points out that in view of the provisions of Section 34(3) of the Maharashtra Rent Act (Act), the Second Appeal is not maintainable.

This Appeal is preferred challenging the judgment in Appeal under section 34 of the Act The submission of Ms. V.V. Tiwari, the learned counsel is well merited.

The Appeal is dismissed as not maintainable.

The fees of the appointed counsel are quantified at Rs. 3,000/-.

JUDGE rsb