Nitin S/O Ramdas Rodge v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through P.S.O. P.S. Umarkhed, Yavatmal And Another

apl.190.15 1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application [APL] No.190 of 2015 (Nitin Ramdas Rodge vs.

The State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. Umarkhed, District Yavatmal and another) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr. A.V. Band, Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr. T.A. Mirza, A.P.P. for Non-Applicant No.1. CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI AND P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ.

DATE : JULY 27, 2015.

Heard the learned Counsel for the rival parties. Insofar as the prayer for quashing of F.I.R. is concerned, we find voluminous evidence against the applicant in the matter of fraud to the extent of Rs.4,20,31,613/-, that was committed with the Maharashtra State Warehousing Corporation in its depot/warehouse at Umerkhed. The Investigating Officer has recorded the statements of witnesses. Paragraphs 5, 6 and 7 of the reply filed by the State clearly show that the applicant is also involved with others in the commission of offence. No case is made out of interference under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing F.I.R., as prayed for. We, therefore, make the following order. O R D E R.

Criminal Application No.190/2015 is rejected. Liberty is granted in favour of the applicant to apply for discharge, if so advised, after filing of the charge-sheet. JUDGE JUDGE *sdw