← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/818/2020rejected

Parshuram Raghunath Durutkar v. State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Ministry Of Rural Development, Mumbai And Others

2022-04-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban Deo1 pages

1 caw 818.2020.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

Civil Application (CAW) No. 818 of 2020 in Writ Petition No. 7532 of 2018 [Parshuram Raghunath Durutkar ..vs.. State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Ministry of Rural Development and ors.] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms. P. T. Joshi with Mr. G. N. Khanzode, Advocates for the applicant/ petitioner Mr. N. R. Rode, A.G.P. for respondents 1 and 2 Mr. A. P. Thakare, Advocate for respondent 3 CORAM : ROHIT B. DEO, J.

DATED : 4- 4Considering the arrears and the fact that the employees, who are dismissed, are awaiting their turn, urgent hearing cannot be granted in the instant matter in which the issue is of reversion.

2.

Civil application is rejected with liberty to the petitioner to move for urgent hearing afresh, after four months.

JUDGE wasnik YUVRAJ WASNIK