Bombay High CourtWP/2394/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Natthuji S/O Raghoji Shinde And Another v. State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary, Revenue Deptt., Mumbai And 4 Others

2015-04-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre1 pages

274wp2394.15 1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.2394 of 2015 (Natthuji s/o. Raghoji Shinde and anr. vs. State, through its Secretary, Revenue Deptt., Mantralaya, Mumbai and Ors.) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr.R.P.Ghanwat, Adv. for the petitioners.

Mr.A.S.Fulzele, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 to 3.

CORAM

: B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & S.B.SHUKRE, JJ.

DATE : 27.4.2015 Heard.

We find that, as yet, no notice u/s. 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 has been issued. The petitioners claim to be in possession. Learned Counsel for the petitioners has also submitted that the petitioners may be forcibly dispossessed. However, the material on record does not show any such attempt by any of the respondents. Hence, keeping all the rival contentions open and with liberty to the petitioners to approach again if any occasion arises, we dispose of the present petition. No costs.

JUDGE JUDGE *jaiswal