Bombay High CourtWP/1502/2021allowed

Rutuja D/O Ravindra Sherkar (Sau. Rutuja W/O Anand Paliya) v. Scheduled Tribe Caste Scrutiny Committee, Amravati And Another

2021-03-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote2 pages

10.wp.1502.2021.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1502/2021 Rutuja D/o Ravindra Sherkar, (Sau. Rutuja W/o Anand Paliya), Aged : 26 Years, Occupation : Student, R/o. Ravi Nagar, Near Panchpavati Play Ground, Amravati, Tq. and Distt. Amravati.

.... PETITIONER // VERSUS //

1. Scheduled Tribe Caste Scrutiny Committee, Irvin Chowk, Amravati, Tq. and District : Amravati, through its Member Secretary.

2. Datta Meghe Institute of Management Studies, through its Principal, Atrey Layout, Nagpur, District - Nagpur 440022.

.... RESPONDENTS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri M. D. Lakhey, Advocate for petitioner.

Shri A. A. Madiwale, AGP for respondent no.1. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND AVINASH G. GHAROTE, JJ.

DATE : 30/03/2021 ORAL JUDGMENT : (PER:- SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.) 1] Heard Shri Lakhey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Madiwale, learned AGP, who appears by waiving notice for respondent no.1.

10.wp.1502.2021.odt 2] Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

3] Heard finally by consent of the parties present before the Court.

4] Notice has not been issued to respondent no.2 as relief claimed against respondent no.2, for the present, is not pressed much. 5] The relief claimed here against respondent no.1 is of limited nature and therefore, this petition is allowed in terms of prayers clause (i). The respondent no.1 is directed to decide the caste claim of petitioner within eight weeks from the date of the order, in accordance with law.

6] It is made clear here that the claim of the petitioner is pending for its verification in this case since last four years and therefore, no further time shall be granted to respondent no.1 for deciding the same in accordance with law within the period stipulated as above.

Rule accordingly. No costs.

(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE J.) Sarkate.