← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/465/2020ca disposed off

Adv. Waman Sadashivrao Chatap v. Election Commission Of India, Thr. Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi And Others

2021-12-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Vinay Joshi2 pages

1 1 election petition cao 639.2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 639 OF 2020 IN ELECTION PETITION NO. 22 OF 2019 Adv. Waman Sadashivrao Chatap ..vs..

The Election Commission of India, thr. The Chief Election Commissioner and ors. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Neeraj S. Khandewale, Advocate a/w Shri S.S. Sanyal, Advocate for Petitioner.

Ms. N.G. Chaubey, Advocate for Respondent No.1 Ms. K.S. Joshi, Government Pleader a/w Shri I.J. Damle, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 3 and 4.

Shri A.S. Manohar, Advocate for respondent no.5. CORAM :

VINAY JOSHI , J.

DATED :

16/12/ Heard.

2.

This application is moved by respondent no.4 - Returning Officer, seeking permission to remove EVMs and VVPAts machines to use in further elections. 3.

Learned Counsel Shri S.S. Sanyal appearing for the Petitioner seeks time to file reply.

4.

Stand over to 03.01.2022.

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 435 OF 2021 Heard.

2.

This is an application under Order VII Rule 11

2 1 election petition cao 639.2020 of Code of Civil Procedure for rejection of petition for non-disclosure of cause of action and material facts. Pleadings are complete. Place the matter for hearing on this application on 03.01.2022.

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 465 OF 2020 Heard.

2.

This an application of respondent no. 1Election Commission of India seeking for deletion of respondent no.1 from the array of respondents. The Petitioner as well as other respondents have no objection for deletion.

3.

In view of that name of respondent no.1 from petitioner stands deleted. Necessary correction be made accordingly. Civil Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Trupti TRUPTI SANTOSHJI AGRAWAL 18.12.2021 10:37