Anil D. Katariya And ORS. v. State Tran. Appellate Tribunal And ORS.

1 ca263-11.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION No. 263 OF 2011 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL STAMP No. 3724 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION No.1681of 2006 Anil D. Katariya and 11 others.

v.

State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai and another. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri N.C. Phadnis, counsel for applicants.

Mrs. K. Deshpande, AGP for respondent no. 1 & 2 CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND Mrs. MRIDULA R. BHATKAR, JJ.

DATED : JANUARY, 8th , 2015.

This civil application is filed for dispensing with objections relating to court fee. It is contended that out of the original 18 petitioners, only 12 petitioners have approached this court and the court fees for 12 appellants each is paid along with this appeal. The contention appears to be correct. The court fee is directed to be paid so far as the appellants who are parties to this appeal are concerned. Civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause. CAZ 597/2012.

The application for early hearing to be considered in June, 2015.

JUDGE JUDGE Hirekhan