← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/607/2015dismissedrule discharged

Ramesh S/O Sunderdas Adwani v. Akash Kumar S/O Kailashchandra Chittarka And 5 Others

2015-04-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 caw607.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.607 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5090 OF 2008 (Ramesh s/o Sunderdas Adwani ..vs. Akash Kumar s/o Kailashchandra Chittarka and others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri V.R. Mundra, Advocate for the petitioner, Shri A.S. Moon, Advocate h/f. Shri M. Anil Kumar, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 4, Dr. R.S. Sundaram, Advocate for the respondent Nos.5 and 6. CORAM : Z.A. HAQ, J.

DATED : 08-04-2015 Heard Shri V.R. Mundra, the learned Advocate for the petitioner. Though the learned Advocate has made elaborate submissions, I do not see any reason to recall the order. The learned Advocate for the petitioner has not been able to point out any error apparent in the order.

The application is dismissed. No costs.

JUDGE pma