← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/1552/2019delay condonatedrejected

Mr. Nageshwar S/O Salikram Kirsan v. Union Of India, Bilaspur Through Its General Manager, South East Central Railway, Bilaspur (C. G.)

2021-01-13Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Anuja Prabhudessai2 pages

1 918 CAO 1552.2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO. 1552 OF 2019 AND MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 725 OF 2018 Mr. Nageshwar s/o Shalikram Kirsan ..VS..

Union of India, thr. the General Manager.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'

s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders of directions and Registrar'

s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri R.S. Charpe, Advocate for applicant.

CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.

DATED : 13/01/2021 Heard.

2.

The applicant has sought for condonation of delay of 253 days in filing restoration application. 3.

In view of the reasons stated in paragraph 2 and 3 of the application, the delay in filing the restoration application, is condoned. Civil Application stands disposed of.

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. ________ OF 2021 The applicant has sought for restoration of First Appeal Stamp No. 725 of 2018 which was dismissed for non-removal of office objection.

3.

Counsel for the applicant states that the office objection shall be removed within a period of two weeks. In view of the statement and in view of the reasons stated in the application for restoration of appeal, the

2 918 CAO 1552.2019 application is allowed and the appeal is ordered to be restored.

4.

The Misc. Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly.

JUDGE Trupti