← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/82/2017dispossed offdismiss for default

Sharad S/O Dinkar Pachkhede v. Shri Rajesh Kumar (I.A.S.), And Others

2017-08-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun Digambarrao Upadhye1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.82/2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3054/2016 (D) Sharad s/o Dinkar Pachkhede ...Versus...

Shri Rajesh Kumar (I.A.S.) Principal Secretary, Water Supply & Sanitation Department, Mumbai - 04 and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri N.N. Thengre, Advocate for petitioner Shri A.S. Fulzele, I/c G.P. for respondents - State CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND ARUN D. UPADHYE, JJ.

DATE : 08.08.2017 Though fact that directions issued by this Court have been complied with is not in dispute, Advocate Shri Thengre wants to demonstrate that compliance is belated. However, in view of compliance and as we do not find any oblique motive, we are not inclined to intervene in continuing the contempt petition. Contempt Petition is disposed of.

JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar