Bombay High CourtCAW/1118/2016ca disposed off

Smt. Sheela Sardarsingh Chauhan v. State Of Mah. Thru. Secty. And 4 ORS.

2016-06-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq2 pages

1 caw1118.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1118 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1854 OF 2008 (Smt. Sheela Sardarsingh Chauhan ..vs.. State of Maharashtra and others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri G.L. Agrawal, Advocate for the petitioner, Shri Prasad Dharaskar, Advocate h/f. Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for the respondent No.5.

CORAM : Z.A. HAQ, J.

DATED : 08-06-2016 The petition is listed by the office with a note that the Civil Application No.1118/2016 is sworn by the original petitioner Smt. Sheela Sardarsingh Chauhan and not by the proposed petitioner who wants to get impleaded in place of the original petitioner. Today an affidavit sworn by Anuj Mataprasad Singh, the proposed petitioner is placed on the record.

Shri Prasad Dharaskar, Advocate holding for Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for the respondent No.5 opposes the application and submits that the claim of the petitioner and the proposed petitioner about the alleged transfer of CL-III licence will have to be verified. Keeping the objection raised on behalf of respondent No.5, open for adjudication at the time of hearing of the petition, Civil Application No.1118/2016

2 caw1118.16 is allowed and the name of Anuj Mataprasad Singh is permitted to be substituted in place of Smt. Sheela Sardarsingh Chauhan.

JUDGE adgokar