Dhananjay S/O Mohanrao Totey v. Shri. Piyush Singh, The Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati
1 cp214.20
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.214 OF 2020 IN WRIT PETITION NO.546 OF 2018 [Dhananjay s/o Mohanrao Totey .vs. Shri Piyush Singh, Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'
s or Judge'
s orders appearances, Court'
s orders of directions and Registrar'
s orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Vishnu B. Gawali, Advocate for the petitioner. ..........
CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR AND N.B. SURYAWANSHI, JJ.
DATED : 07.01.2021.
The grievance of the petitioner is that the order dated 8.1.2020 passed in Writ Petition No.546/2018 is not complied with in its letter and spirit. As per the said order, the petitioner was directed to be continued as contractual Law Officer till appropriate decision is taken in the matter by respondent no.3 in compliance with the directions given by this Court. The petitioner was further directed to pay the remuneration for the period for which he had already worked. It is not in dispute that the remuneration as directed by this court has already been paid to the petitioner and the representation of the petitioner is decided on 24.1.2020.
Learned advocate for the petitioner tried to urge that the period of appointment of the petitioner
2 cp214.20 should have been continued up to October-2020 and the respondents have committed an error in rejecting the representation of the petitioner.
We find that the grievance of the petitioner can be redressed in an appropriate proceedings. We do not find any willful disobedience of the order passed in the writ petition. Hence, the contempt petition is dismissed. The petitioner is at liberty to agitate his grievance, if any, by filing appropriate proceedings. JUDGE JUDGE Gulande