Bombay High CourtAPPLN/14/2016dismissed

Dr. Girdharilal S/O Khemchand Bajaj v. State Of Maharashtra, Through P.S.O. Rajapeth, Amravati And Another

2016-03-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 appln14.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 14 OF 2016 (DR. GIRDHARILAL KHEMCHAND BAJAJ...VS..STATE OF MAH. THR. PSO PS RAJAPETH, AMRAVATI & ANOTHER) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : MARCH 22, 2016.

Heard Shri P.V.Navlani, advocate for the applicant and Shri N.B.Jawade, A.P.P. for the non-applicant No.1.

The applicant has filed this application under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying that the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge on 1st February, 2016 in Bail Application No.70 of 2016 granting pre-arrest bail to the non-applicant No.2 be set aside. With the assistance of the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P., I have examined the documents placed on record of the application as also the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge on 1st February, 2016. In paragraph 6 of the order the learned Additional Sessions Judge has dealt with all the relevant aspects which are required to be adverted to while considering the application for grant of pre-arrest bail. The impugned order cannot be faulted with. I see no reason to grant the prayer made in the present application. The criminal application is dismissed.

JUDGE RRaut..