Bombay High CourtCAO/1510/2016admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Smt. Shilpi W/O. Sudip Pradhan v. Sudip S/O. Bharatchandra Pradhan

2016-10-05Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Kum. Justice Indira Jain2 pages

CAO1510-16 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.O. NO.1510/2016 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL ST. NO. 6277/2016 (SHILPI SUDIP PRADHAN VERSUS SUDIP BHARATCHANDRA PRADHAN) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Mahesh Rai, counsel for the applicant.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.

DATE : OCTOBER 05 , 2016.

Heard. Perused the contents of the application. None appears for the respondent, though served. The respondent has also not filed a reply to the application. The statements of facts made in the application remain uncontroverted.

For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the Family Court Appeal is condoned. The civil application is allowed and disposed of.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE

CAO1510-16 CERTIFICATE I certify that this Order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Order.

Uploaded by: Rohit D. Apte.

Uploaded on :06.10.2016.