Sai Baba Rice Mill Morgaon, Lakhani, Bhandara Thr. Power Of Attorney Holder, Sarang G. Khedikar v. State Of Maha., Dept. Of Food, Civil Supply And Consumer Prot Dept., Thr. Secy., Mumbai And ORS.

caw 870.23 & 871.23+12.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application (CAW) No. 870 of 2023 in WRIT PETITION NO.7644 OF 2022 (Sai Baba Rice Mill, Morgoan Vs. State of Maharashtra and others) with Civil Application (CAW) No. 871 of 2023 in WRIT PETITION NO.7642 OF 2022 (Annapurna Rice Mill Seloti Vs. State of Maharashtra and others) with WRIT PETITION NO.7636 OF 2022 (Devkrupa Rice Mill Parsodi Vs. State of Maharashtra and others) with WRIT PETITION NO.7647 OF 2022 (Shree Sai Ganga Rice Mill, Pahungoan Vs. State of Maharashtra and others) with WRIT PETITION NO.7641 OF 2022 (Pragati Rice Mill Vs. State of Maharashtra and others) with WRIT PETITION NO.7640 OF 2022 (Shankar Rice Mill, Karandla Vs. State of Maharashtra and others) with WRIT PETITION NO.7643 OF 2022 (A.R. Rice Udyog, Bhilewada Vs. State of Maharashtra and others) with WRIT PETITION NO.

7637 OF 2022 (Jai Hind Milling and Sortex Unit Morgoan/Raje Vs. State of Maharashtra and others) with WRIT PETITION NO.7645 OF 2022 (Jai Hind Rice Mill, Rajgaon Moregaon Vs. State of Maharashtra and others) with WRIT PETITION NO.7639 OF 2022 (Shri Janta Rice Mill, Kindhada Vs. State of Maharashtra and others) with WRIT PETITION NO.7638 OF 2022 (Tara Industries, At Mangli Post Khapa Vs. State of Maharashtra and others) with WRIT PETITION NO.7646 OF 2022 (Shivshankar Modern Rice Mill Vs. State of Maharashtra and others) with WRIT PETITION NO.

OF 2022 (Bajrang Rice Mill Vs. State of Maharashtra and others)

caw 870.23 & 871.23+12.odt with WRIT PETITION NO.

OF 2022 (Maya Rice Mill Industries Vs. State of Maharashtra and others) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. A. M. Ghare, Advocate for applicants/petitioners in CAW 870 & 871 of 2023 with Mr. R. V. Gahilot, Advocate for Petitioners in respective petitions. Mr. N. S. Rao, AGP for Respondents 1 to 3/State. CORAM: ROHIT B. DEO AND MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATE: 20 th MARCH, 2023.

It is common ground that due to inadvertence, the order dated 9-3-2023 does not incorporate our observation that if the order passed by the Collector is adverse to the petitioners, the same shall not be given effect to for seven days from the date of its communication.

2.

The order dated 9-3-2023 be corrected and the following paragraph be added as "5-A".

5-A.

If the order passed by the Collector is adverse to the petitioners, the same shall not be given effect to for the period of 7 days from the date of its communication to the petitioners.

3.

Order dated 9-3-2023 be corrected and corrected order be uploaded.

4.

The civil applications are disposed of.

5.

Steno copy is granted.

(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (ROHIT B. DEO, J.) wasnik YUVRAJ WASNIK