Kailash Datta Pimpale (Dead) Thr. Lrs. Laxmibai Kailash Pimpale And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra Thorugh District Collector, Yavatmal And Others
2024:BHC-NAG:10283 1 F.A. No.891.2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR FIRST APPEAL NO.
OF Kailash Datta Pimpale, Original claimant (Dead) through his legal heirs Laxmibai Kailash Pimpale and two others ..VS..
The State of Maharashtra through District Collector, Yavatmal & two others --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. N. Z. Mirza, Advocate for appellants.
Mr. M. A. Kadu, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 and 3.
Mr. K. R. Lule, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATED : 12 th SEPTEMBER, 2024 1.
Heard.
2.
Considering the fact that the issue in this appeal is covered by the Judgments of this Court in First Appeal No.355 of 2018 (Ramrao Masaji Dantalwad Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.,) decided on 10.12.2018 and First Appeal No.1151 of 2008 and other connected matters (Nivrutti Hari Adagale Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.,) decided on 04.07.2017, the learned Advocate for the appellants prayed that this appeal be also allowed in terms of the above judgments. The aforesaid preposition is not disputed by the respondents.
3.
In view of that, the present appeal stands allowed on the basis of principle of parity in terms of the above referred judgments.
2 F.A. No.891.2024 4.
The appellants are entitled for compensation at the rate of Rs.83,000/- per hector along with other statutory benefits, except the period for which the delay was caused in filing the appeal and it was condoned by this Court by order dated 09.08.2024.
5.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) Kirtak