← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2072/2023dismissed

Sau. Sheela Arvind Bakade And Others v. Nitin Laxmanrao Bakade And Another

2023-03-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote1 pages

904. WP 2072 of 2023.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2072/2023 Sau. Sheela Arvind Bakade and others ...Versus...

Nitin Laxmanrao Bakade and another - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Shri D.B. Abhyankar, Advocate for petitioners Mrs. M.A. Barabde, AGP for respondent no.2 CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.

DATE : 31/03/2023 The question whether the respondent no.1 is a member of the Trust or not has not been gone into by the learned Assistant Charity Commissioner in the impugned order (pg.38). The application for intervention has been allowed on the ground that there is material placed on record to indicate some interest in the respondent no.1. Since the petitioners, who were having best evidence, in the form of membership of the society, to oppose the application, which has not been placed on record, I do not see any reason to interfere in the impugned order. The writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) Wadkar SUKHADEORAO WADKAR