Maharashtra State Warehousing Corporation, Yavatmal Through Its Storage Superintendent And Another v. Pusad Urban Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Pusad Through Its Chief Executive Officer And Others
1 wp6772.18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.6772/2018 Maharashtra State Warehousing Corporation, Pusad and another ..V/s..
Pusad Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. and others AND WRIT PETITION NO.7675/2018 Maharashtra State Warehousing Corporation, Pusad and another ..V/s..
Pusad Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. and others AND WRIT PETITION NO.6774/2018 Maharashtra State Warehousing Corporation, Pusad and another ..V/s..
Pusad Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'
s or Judge'
s orders appearances, Court'
s orders of directions and Registrar'
s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri N.R. Saboo, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Abhay Sambre, Advocate for respondent No.1. CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
DATED : 14.1.2020.
1] The learned Advocate for the petitioners in these three petitions submits that as a pursis has been entered in each of these petitions by respondent No.1 bank, which is supported by respondent No.2 borrower and guarantor, that these three petitions are rendered infructuous and can be disposed off.
2] In view of the above, these three petitions stand disposed off as being infructuous. No costs. (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Tambaskar.