Sau. Shalini W/O Gunakar Shelokar And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Principal Secretary, Mantralaya, Mumbai And Others

1 wp1888.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WP No. 1888 of 2016 Sau Shalini and ors v. The State of Maharashtra and ors - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri P. D. Sharma, Advocate for petitioners Shri Ambarish Joshi, Asst. Govt. Pleader for respondents CORAM : SMT VASANTI A. NAIK AND V. M. DESHPANDE, JJ DATED : 18th March 2016 The petitioners challenge the select list prepared by the respondent no. 4 for appointment to the post of Police Patil.

Shri Ambarish Joshi, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents no. 1 to 4 raised a preliminary objection to the tenability of the writ petition. It is stated that the petitioner has an alternate remedy of approaching the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act.

By upholding the preliminary objection raised on behalf of the respondents, we decline to entertain the writ petition.

The writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. The points raised in the petition are kept open. JUDGE JUDGE

2 wp1888.16 joshi