Bombay High CourtWP/256/2020dismissed

Yadavrao Maroti Navghare (In Jail) v. State Of Mah. Thr. Its Secretary, Home Dep. Mumbai-32 And Anotehr

2020-10-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote1 pages

2310wp256.2020.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.256/2020 Yadavrao Maroti Navghare (In Jail) ...Versus...

State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Home Department, Mumbai - 32 and another - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'

s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders of directions and Registrar'

s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- - - Ms S.B. Khobragade, Counsel for petitioner Mrs. N.R. Tripathi, Addl. G.P. for respondents CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND AVINASH G. GHAROTE, JJ.

DATE : 23/10/2020 In this petition, there is no mention whatsoever regarding the petitioner having first approached the respondents for grant of remission of sentence, in terms of the Government Resolution dated 03/06/2017.

It would be necessary for the petitioner to approach the authorities in the first instance for such kind of relief. If the petitioner has already approached, the petitioner is at liberty to pursue the same before the competent authority.

Thus, we find this petition is premature and is dismissed as such.

JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar Shailendra Wadkar Shailendra Wadkar Date: 2020.10.23 18:30:29 +0530