Bombay High CourtWP/2976/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Arun S/O. Inderchand Sahu v. Union Of India, Nagpur, Through Rbi Governor And Others

2016-06-16Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Swapna Joshi1 pages

1 wp2976.16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2976 OF 2016 [Arun s/o Inderchand Sahu .vs. Union of India and others] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri M. Anilkumar, counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Mehta, AGP for the respondent nos.2 to 4. ..........

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : JUNE 16, 2016.

Shri M. Anilkumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is ready to make the mandatory deposit as directed by the revisional authority and avail the remedy of revision. It is stated that the amount would be deposited before the revisional authority within a period of four weeks.

If the amount is so deposited by the petitioner before the revisional authority within a period of four weeks, the revisional authority may decide the revision in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE Gulande