← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPA/306/2021disposed off

Sanjay S/O Balaram Karemore v. Kashiram S/O Shaligram Lanjewar

2021-08-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Vinay Joshi2 pages

3appa 306.2021.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Application (APPA) No. 306/2021 IN Criminal Appeal No. /2021 Sanjay s/o Balaram Karemore ..VS..

Kashiram s/o Shaligram Lanjewar ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court'

s or Judge'

s Order Coram, appearances, Court'

s Orders or directions and Registrar'

s order__________________________________________________________ Shri R.M. Vaidya, Advocate for the appellant/applicant CORAM : VINAY JOSHI, J.

DATED : 03/08/2021 This is an application seeking leave to challenge the order of acquittal passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Tumsar in Summary Criminal Complaint No. 92/2015 relating to offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

2.

The learned Counsel for the applicant/appellant would submit that lower Court erred in holding that there was no legally enforceable liability i.e. the debt was time barred which resulted into acquittal. He took me through the impugned judgment and the evidence led before the trial Court. It is pointed out that issuance of cheque, signature of accused, receipt of SMGate

3appa 306.2021.odt statutory notice are not denied. According to him, since inception defence of time barred debt was not taken, but without such suggestion, the trial Court relied the defence. In context to said submission, the impugned judgment is gone into.

3.

There are triable issues. Hence, leave to file an appeal is granted. The appeal be numbered. Criminal Appeal No. /2021 Issue notice to the respondent, returnable after four weeks.

JUDGE SMGate