← Library
Bombay High CourtMCA/1302/2018admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Dipratnakar S/O Maharudranath Tekule v. Sau. Rupali W/O Dipratnakar Tekule And Others

2018-11-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun Digambarrao Upadhye2 pages

911ca1629.18.odt 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO. 1629/2018 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION STAMP NO.6395/2018 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1112/2017 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 377/2016 Dipratnakar s/o Maharudranath Tekule Vs. Rupali Dipratnakar Tekule --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Hemant Survey, Advocate for the applicant. CORAM: ARUN D. UPADHYE , J.

DATE: 28-11-2018.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant. It is submitted that though notice was issued to the non-applicant, she refused to accept the notice. Perused the application. There is a delay of 60 days in filing the restoration application. Considering the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned. The civil application is allowed.

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 6395/2018. Perused the application. Considering the reasons stated in the application, the restoration application is allowed.

The Civil Application (CAO) No. 1112/2017 for modification of the order be restored to the original file.

911ca1629.18.odt 2 The applicant is permitted to mention the matter before same Court.

JUDGE rkn