← Library
Bombay High CourtAPL/469/2024allowed

Vikas S/O Chandrakant Nakhate v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Ps Sakkardara Nagpur City Nagpur And Another

2024-03-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Vinay Joshi,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi4 pages

2024:BHC-NAG:3730-DB 1 42-Cri.APL No.409.2022+1.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.

OF 1) Shakuntala Chandrakant Nakhate, Aged about 50 years, Occu. - Household, 2) Sau. Harsha Khateshwar Korade, Aged about 34 years, Occu. - Household, 3) Khateshwar Anandrao Korade, Aged about 44 years, Occu. - Tailor, All R/o. Shivam Colony, Gadgadeshwar, Amravati, Tq. and District - Amravati.

.... APPLICANTS // VERSUS // 1) The State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Police Station, Sakkardara, Nagpur City, Nagpur.

2) Deepali W/o Vikas Nakhate, Aged about 30 years, Occu. Household, R/o. Plot No.01, New Bidipeth, Near Mahakalkar Sabhagruha, Sakkardara, Nagpur, Tq. & Dist. Nagpur.

.... NON-APPLIC ANTS WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.

OF Vikas S/o Chandrakant Nakhate, Aged about 32 years, Occu. - Private Job, R/o. Shivam Colony, Near Gadgadeshwar Mandir, Amravati, Tq. & Dist. - Amravati.

.... APPLICANT

2 42-Cri.APL No.409.2022+1.odt // VERSUS // 1) The State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Police Station, Sakkardara, Nagpur City, Nagpur.

2) Deepali W/o Vikas Nakhate, Aged about 32 years, Occu. Service, R/o. Plot No.01, New Bidipeth, Near Mahakalkar Sabhagruha, Sakkardara, Nagpur, Tq. & Dist.Nagpur.

.... NON-APPLIC ANTS ____________________________________________________________ Mr. S.B. Gandhe, Advocate for Applicants.

Mr. S.B. Bissa, Additional Public Prosecutor for Non-applicant No.1/State.

Mr. D.P. Mankar, Advocate h/f. Mr. S.R. Agrawal, Advocate for Non-applicant No.2.

____________________________________________________________ CORAM : VINAY JOSHI AND M RS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI , JJ .

DATED : 26 th MARCH, ORAL JUDGMENT : (Per Vinay Joshi, J.) 1.

Heard.

2.

Admit. Heard finally by consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

3.

Husband and relatives of husband have applied for quashing of First Information Report(FIR) in Crime No. 107/2022,

3 42-Cri.APL No.409.2022+1.odt registered with Police Station, Sakkardara, Nagpur City for the offences punishable under Sections 294, 323, 498A and 506 of the Indian Penal Code on account of settlement.

4.

The informant lady got married with applicant Vikas Nakhate on 01.12.2019 and started to cohabit with her husband and in-laws. After marriage, pursuing matrimonial harassment, she started to live separately from 12.08.2021 onwards. She has also filed a report, on the basis of which, crime has been registered. It is informed that yet charge-sheet has not been filed. 5.

During pendency, due to intervention of relatives, matter has been amicably resolved. Both were in agreement that they could not live together hence, unanimously decided to sever matrimonial ties by obtaining decree of divorce. The husband has agreed to pay sum of Rs. 10,00,000/- towards one time settlement. In terms of settlement by the time entire money has been paid to the wife. 6.

The informant/wife appeared before us and also endorsed about settlement and no objection to quash the proceedings. Since, it was a matrimonial dispute, we find no reason to decline the urge. As the matter is settled, continuation of prosecution amounts to exercise in futility.

4 42-Cri.APL No.409.2022+1.odt 7.

In view of above, both Applications are allowed. We hereby quash and set aside the First Information Report in Crime No. 107/2022, registered with Police Station, Sakkardara, Nagpur City for the offences punishable under Sections 294, 323, 498A and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. (MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (VINAY JOSHI, J.) Kirtak